<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How fair use was born</title>
	<atom:link href="http://library.duke.edu/blogs/scholcomm/2009/05/21/how-fair-use-was-born/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://library.duke.edu/blogs/scholcomm/2009/05/21/how-fair-use-was-born/</link>
	<description>Duke&#039;s source for advice and information about copyright and publication issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:32:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scholarly Communications @ Duke &#187; Can a &#8220;batty&#8221; ruling effect needed change?</title>
		<link>http://library.duke.edu/blogs/scholcomm/2009/05/21/how-fair-use-was-born/comment-page-1/#comment-793131</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholarly Communications @ Duke &#187; Can a &#8220;batty&#8221; ruling effect needed change?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://library.duke.edu/blogs/scholcomm/?p=1371#comment-793131</guid>
		<description>[...] in copyright law, to prepare derivative works.  That right has not always been part of copyright; there was a time when even abridgments and translations were held not to infringe on an original.  The pendulum has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in copyright law, to prepare derivative works.  That right has not always been part of copyright; there was a time when even abridgments and translations were held not to infringe on an original.  The pendulum has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
