The globals move around the world wherever organs might be available, and, because they can afford the price of transportation, medical procedures, and fees for organs, they can buy life while others suffer or die. The locals, on the other hand, wherever they are, are the main suppliers of organs, with all the consequences of that status. (Strassberg, "Organ Transplantation--a Challenge for Global Ethics")
Globalization and transplants? Global ethics and organ distribution? In her article Commodity Fetishism and the Global Traffic in Organs, Nancy Scheper-Hughes presents the distribution of organs and tissue as an industry, and discusses the economic implications of organ trafficking for richer and poorer nations. Recent books describing the black market include Michele Goodwin’s Black market: the supply and demand of body parts and Annie Cheney’s Body brokers : inside America’s underground trade in human remains, both published this year.
A number of scholars look into the ethical complexities of this international market in a 2003 issue of Zygon, Symposium on organ transplants: religion, science, and global ethics (Strassberg, "Symposium on Organ Transplants: Religion, Science, and Global Ethics"). In her introduction to the volume Barbara Strassberg offers the terms global and local which frees us to look at the problems and responsibilities of organ donation within a country’s borders as well as transnationally. Her central concern is how to develop models for the “new ethical regulations” required in the global economy (Strassberg, "Symposium on Organ Transplants: Religion, Science, and Global Ethics").
The flip side of organ distribution, with its own economic implications, is fertility tourism and organ tourism when either parents or patients travel from countries which restrict pre-genetic diagnosis or organ donation to those with more liberal policies.
The ongoing and difficult debate, given the difference in supply and need, has an arena within the United States as well: fee or free? How would paying for organs affect their distribution? What is the most effective way to run an organ bank? David Howard looks at how surgeons select livers for their patients in Why do Transplant Surgeons turn down Organs?. In a later article, Hope versus efficiency in organ allocation, he reviews distribution practices. What criteria would you use to determine who receives an organ? By geographic proximity? According to how long a hopeful recipient has been listed at the organ bank? What if someone else’s need is more urgent?
Working bibliography
Below are some additional books and articles of possible interest:
Jumpstart your research
To jumpstart a research project, always begin with the Duke Libraries homepage at http://library.duke.edu/ which will direct you to materials, experts and research tools on your topic.
BOOKS:
For books, look in Duke’s catalog for additional titles. Try the following:
Library of Congress Subject Headings:
MESH (Medical Subject Headings):
ARTICLES:
To find recent articles, start with EconLit which indexes scholarly journals in economics and related subjects. (Go to the “Databases A-Z” link and look under “E”, or search by title). ABI-Inform indexes journals in business and industry. Begin with the subject headings:
The Economist Intelligence Unit also identifies articles and materials relevant to organ transplantation and government policy. It is “A full-text database that provides (in PDF and HTML) an overview of economic, political, market, investment, and trading conditions for more than 180 countries in all regions of the world.” PAIS and Worldwide Political Science Abstracts include articles about the economic aspects of the organ and tissue industry, but with emphasis on public policy and political science.
Unless otherwise specified on this page, this work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.