Guide to the Committee Against the Nixon-Duke Library (CANDL) Records, 1981
Records of the Committee Against the Nixon-Duke Library (CANDL), an organization formed primarily by Duke Alumnus Ruffin Slater and Duke Professor of Psychology Norman Guttman to generate and coordinate opposition to the proposal to locate the Richard Nixon Presidential Library on or near the university's campus.
- University Archives, Duke University
- Duke University. Committee Against the Nixon-Duke Library.
- Committee Against the Nixon-Duke Library (CANDL) records 1981.
- 0.2 Linear feet, 200 Items
- For current information on the location of these materials, please consult Duke University Archives.
Researchers must register and agree to copyright and privacy laws before using this collection.
Collection is open for research.
Copyright for official University records is held by Duke University; all other copyright is retained by the authors of items in these papers, or their descendants, as stipulated by United States copyright law.
In late July 1981, Terry Sanford initiated negotiations with former president Richard Nixon (Duke Law 1937) to locate the Nixon presidential library on the campus of his alma mater. When this information was revealed to faculty members during the week of August 10, 1981, many opposed the proposition as well as Sanford's failure to consult the faculty prior to initiating negotiations.
Many who opposed the library had moral objections to memorializing a president whose behavior in office was reproachable, and they feared a negative effect on the university's reputation. Other concerns included the effects of greatly increased tourist traffic on campus and the aesthetic nature of the large proposed structure. However, supporters of erecting the Nixon Library on campus argued that the scholarly and academic benefits of locating the vast Nixon Presidential Materials collection on campus should and would outweigh any moral concerns. These supporters tended to denounce the actions of vocal dissenters as divisive and/or arrogant.
Meetings of the Academic Council and Board of Trustees during September and October 1981 were dominated by this debate, and a group of faculty formed the Committee Against the Nixon-Duke Library (CANDL) to organize the efforts of faculty, students, alumni, and others opposed to the proposed library. Although the Academic Council voted not to recommend further negotiations with Nixon in a 35-34 decision September 3, 1981, the Board of Trustees later voted 9-2 to proceed. By April 1982 negotiations had stalled, and a year later Nixon's representatives announced that a site at Chapman College in San Clemente, California, had been chosen for the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library.
- Barber, James David
- Nixon, Richard M.(Richard Milhous), 1913-
- Nixon, Richard M. (Richard Milhous), 1913- --Caricatures and cartoons
- Nixon, Richard M. (Richard Milhous), 1913- --Public opinion
- Sanford, Terry, 1917-
- Duke University -- Alumni and alumnae
- Duke University. Committee Against the Nixon-Duke Library
- Duke University -- History -- 20th century
- Duke University. Nixon Library Committee
- Presidential libraries
- Nixon Library Controversy collection. (University Archives, Duke University.)
- Richard M. Nixon reference collection. (University Archives, Duke University. )
[Identification of item], Committee Against the Nixon-Duke Library (CANDL) Records, Duke University Archives, David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Duke University.
Accession No. 83-11 received 18 January 1983: Clippings, correspondence, presidential libraries publications.
Accession No. 84-5 received 27 January 1984: Financial records, publicity materials and membership information.
Originally 2 boxes, 1.4 linear feet. All clippings were discarded, as the Nixon Library Controversy Collection contained processed clippings. Also, Presidential Libraries publications, correspondence, reports, and other items duplicated in the Nixon Library Controversy Collection were discarded. Additionally, response cards were discarded, as much information is duplicated in typed mailing lists.
Processed by Cat Saleeby, August 2001
Encoded by Joshua McKim, December 2002
This finding aid is NCEAD compliant.